Regarding What Brit Hume Said…

by Danny Fisher

Thanks to a post by our pal in the Buddhoblogosphere and my editor over at Shambhala Sun Space, Mr. Rod Meade Sperry, as well as several reactions at other Buddhist blogs, I think most everyone reading this blog is probably aware by now of some rather repugnant and certainly ignorant comments made by Fox News’ Brit Hume regarding Tiger Woods’ Buddhist practice.  Rather than attempt to rant mindfully (a paradoxical proposition if ever there was one), I’ll simply present one view of Christianity and religious pluralism from a Buddhist perspective:  His Holiness the Dalai Lama’s…

I do not personally advocate seeking a universal religion; I don’t think it advisable to do so. And if we proceed too far in drawing these parallels and ignoring the differences, we might end up doing exactly that!  …One teaching or one view will not satisfy. To some people Christianity is much more effective, in some other case, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, or Zoroastrianism.  …I can say that for me personally, Buddhism is best because the Buddhist approach is most effective to me.  This does not mean Buddhism is best for everyone.  Now, for my Christian brother or sister, Christianity is best for him or for her.  Here, the concept of one religion, one truth, is very relevant for the individual, but for the community it must be several truths, several religions.